When Is an AI System Ready for Real Use?
Tested, approved and deployed are not the answer. Thirteen frames on readiness as a judgment about one exposure, for one use.
01 / 13 · When is an AI system ready for real use?
- Frame 01 of 13
When is an AI system ready for real use?
A small bridge with a sign reading tested with: bicycles, a lorry marked PROD driving onto it, and an engineer on the far bank saluting: ship it. Deployed, delighted, disowned. Ready for what, exactly? Tested, approved and deployed are each worth something, and none of them is the answer. Readiness means the evidence and controls justify this exposure: these users, doing this job, with these consequences when it is wrong.
- Frame 02 of 13
Ready for what, exactly?
The same system is fine for a team reviewing its output internally, and not yet for customers acting on it. Same system, different exposure. Naming the exposure precisely, which users doing what with what riding on it, turns an unanswerable question into one with an answer.
- Frame 03 of 13
Tested from a chair
Tested from a chair. Deployed from a plane. A system is not ready in general. It is ready, or not, for a particular exposure to a particular use.
- Frame 04 of 13
The demo proved it's possible
The demo: one user, one happy path, little at stake. Real use: malformed input, a slow upstream system, a goal nobody anticipated, and failures that are expensive. Readiness asks about conditions the demo may never have exercised, and silence in the evidence isn't a pass.
- Frame 05 of 13
Flawless demo
Twelve rehearsals. One user. One path. A demonstration compresses the system: one user, one goal, a selected input, one path through, little at stake. It shows the thing is possible, which is a narrower question than whether it is ready.
- Frame 06 of 13
Set the bar before you look
A release bar set first, and a lower one moved after seeing the results, which is crossed out: that is fitting the rule to the results. Define the release criterion against an evaluation set that fits the use and its failure costs, before exposure.
- Frame 07 of 13
Target painted after
Bullseye. Target painted afterwards. Define an explicit release criterion against an evaluation set that fits the intended use and its failure consequences, before exposure rather than after.
- Frame 08 of 13
The fallback queue
Fallback: a queue. Reader: nobody. Name the safe alternative that actually exists when the system should not continue: stop and say so, decline, keep the prior state, queue it, restrict it, or hand it to a person who can act. A queue nobody can act on doesn't count.
- Frame 09 of 13
Some things don't un-send
Some effects don't come back: a sent message, a payment made. Ask what can be stopped before more happens, reversed, corrected after the fact, or contained to limit how far it travels, and at what cost.
- Frame 10 of 13
The undo button
The undo button. Connected to nothing. Before exposure, name what can really be reversed and how. In this repository, when checks that run after a draft is placed fail, the previous state of the affected files is restored.
- Frame 11 of 13
Whose name is on it
Everyone points. Nobody's name is on it. Before exposure, somebody owns the decision to expose, and somebody owns the response when it misbehaves. If nobody can be named for either, that is itself a finding about readiness.
- Frame 12 of 13
Best before
Approved. Best before the next model update. A change to the model, the instructions, the retrieved corpus, a tool, the workflow or the intended users can undermine part of the basis the release decision rested on.
- Frame 13 of 13
Three answers, in writing
Three answers, in writing: what evidence exists against the failures that matter, what limits the damage when that evidence is incomplete, and who decides and who answers, named rather than assumed. If they can't be answered, nobody can say yet, which is more fixable than unready.